Notable Quotable:

Notable Quotable:

Remember, folks: whenever a woman says "die for me because you are a man," just look her in the eye and say "my body, my choice."
TCM

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Doing the Turtle (hiding in my shell)

Just a quick update.  Things are picking up in the real world around here.  A week or so ago (I'm  losing track...) I logged on to Lending Tree and Quicken Loans to look into mortgage pre-approval.  That was at 6:00 am.  I got my first phone call at 8:30, and came home from work to find a dozen voicemails.  WolfAlpha still needs to call the credit union and see what they have to offer.  When these guys say they compete, they're not kidding - loan fees range from 1% of the loan amount to ZERO!  (and since we're going VA, the interest rates don't vary much.)

WolfAlpha didn't come home this past week, instead he drove to a couple of houses on our list.  So far it's a bit discouraging.  The nicer houses in our price range are a solid hour away from the airport.  He's getting a bit old for that long commute, but it's probably unavoidable.  How pathetic are we?  We're both feeling overwhelmed, and encouraging each other over the phone.  We're doing OK really, limping along, but we want this to be over!  

I got some comic relief from Maxine though.  She can't believe I'm "letting" him house hunt without me.  The plan is for him to schedule a viewing of the best prospects for a few weeks from now, I'll fly out for a weekend, we'll make an offer, and he will sign everything with power of attorney.  Maxine thinks I should be out there every weekend looking at houses - how can I trust him to know what I want?  What about the community?  The shopping?  Please.  What either of us "wants" has never been much of an issue.  We don't want the debt load that comes with what we "want;" we'll be happy to get what we need.  Community?  We'll either be in a smallish town or out in the country.  And shopping?  I've lived in Hooterville for 16 years after growing up half  an hour from Woodfield Mall.  Remember Woodfield?  In Schaumburg?  Yeah, that place - it used to be a big fat hairy deal!   It would be an understatement to say that I've grown accustomed to compromise, and we're moving to within an hour of some of the best shopping on this planet!!! How much control do I really need in this process?  How much can I control?

In other (TOTALLY FREAKIN' AWESOME) news, WolfAlpha received that "signing bonus" for which we though he was ineligible!  And he celebrated by buying me Fanny May Trinidads and some, um, "sleepwear."  After a year and a half, it's finally starting to sink in that I no longer have to wear frumpy, modest PJs because I'm raising a son!  And incidentally, Lance Criminal is doing well.  He was restricted from the internet for a while because he committed a minor no-no, so I hadn't heard from him for a few weeks.  He "got to meet the Colonel," but his record is still officially "clean."  Live and learn.

Saturday, March 17, 2012

...And Another One

My second request this week came from a marketer with something to sell.  Normally this would go in the "trash," almost on principle.  My blog is not a commercial venture, and I hesitate to promote a product I haven't used.  But these guys are pretty creative.  I like what they have to say:

(Also, I'm an ignoramus because I don't know how to properly embed objects, so I copied/pasted the image.)  Here's the link if you want to see it without my blogroll superimposed:

http://www.onlinecriminaljusticedegree.com/tsa-waste/


I've Been Solicited!

Twice this week!
And I said "yes" both times.
The site "Taken in Hand" asked if they could publish a comment I made on Dalrock's blog, so I went for it.  It's an interesting blog; it's not "kinky" enough to be a fetishist site, but clearly some fetishists contribute and follow.  It seems a number of folks there are OK with spanking outside the bedroom.  I'm not among them.  Male dominance is natural, but spanking is an arbitrary and unnatural  "punishment," not appropriate among adults except in fun.  If a spouse screws up, the consequences should be real, and  not contrived by the other spouse.  That said, I received some pretty interesting responses to my "article."  I'm publishing the article itself, but feel free to follow the link and read the conversation:

http://www.takeninhand.com/do.women.really.want.to.defeat.men#comment-25122

These are among the comments that Complementarian Loners also published a few weeks ago:

http://curmudgeonloner.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/suz-says-about-dominant-men/#comment-2028

Methinks I must have struck a nerve.


Do women really want to defeat men?

We think we want to defeat men, because that’s what we’ve been taught, yet we’re miserable when we succeed. This is why we go for “alphas” and end up with jerks. THEY DISPLAY POWER. In jerks, that power is a false front; they don’t dominate, they domineer. Because that’s all they’ve got. We’re looking for strong benevolent domination (a man who will sacrifice to preserve and protect what he possesses) and at first glance domination and domineering look similar. We see a power display and it blows our circuits. We tolerate any degradation for it, deluding ourselves and hoping that it might be the real deal. We’d rather die than admit that we need to be “owned,” because that’s not permitted by feminism, but we can’t stop ourselves from trawling for domineering assholes and hoping to pick up a “real man” among them. Our need for a dominant mate runs far deeper than cultural norms and social engineering.
Feminism, combined with the low-risk lifestyle afforded by surplus resources, has neutered men and taught them to be weak. In this environment women CAN “defeat” men, and we’re taught that we are supposed to, so we do. We consciously devote ourselves to dominating men, yet on a visceral level we despise men who can be dominated. Since the option of acting like real women is socially unacceptable, we try to achieve satisfaction by being the best damn non-women we can be. It never occurs to most of us that we’d be happy if we turned our backs on society and lived as we were designed to. We just keep forging ahead in the wrong direction—the hamster on speed. Women are frequently domineering (we rarely have what it takes to dominate much of anything) but this is almost always a matter of shit testing. Again, we can’t admit this, so we say we’re just acting like strong modern women, but what would really satisfy us (unbeknownst to us) is a man who can override our attempts at dominance, and dominate US.
And what “real man” has the opportunity to display his masculinity in the modern world? There are no dragons to slay, and sensible men don’t waste their energy posturing. Deeply “male” prowess has become recreational (except in the acquisition of money.) Hunting, fighting and competition are leisure activities, and we deride them as frivolous. The exception here is among military, cops and firefighters. Women absolutely drool over professional he-men because like assholes, those men act powerful. We fall for false (or real) displays of power EVERY TIME, because we need powerful men. PUAs know this and use it to their advantage, easily dazzling us. We’re stupid that way. The fact that we chase posturing pricks is all the proof you need that we’re lying through our teeth when we say we want “subservient” men. What we really want is strong men who have the courage to whip out their dicks and show us they’ve got what it takes to keep us safe. Honorable men who actually do have “what it takes” usually obey the rules though, so they hesitate and lose out. “Bad boys” never hesitate; they don’t care about having what it takes because they have no desire to protect or preserve anything but themselves. They just want to get laid. They don’t even have to me misogynistic; they want what they want and we’re giving it away. No harm, no foul.
“Whipping it out” is the only time-tested way to win a woman’s devotion. And yes, we are as capable of devotion as men are. That devotion will last a lifetime if the man is genuinely dominant, not just domineering. Social engineering cannot override biology.
We want the fairy tale; we were raised to believe we deserve it. We need strong men. We are unhappy with men we perceive as weak. We beat them down and discard them. If we wanted weak men, we’d keep them once we had them under our thumbs. Instead we dump them to chase “strong” men. We’ve been demanding more power for decades, yet the more power we get the unhappier we become. And since we Grrrlz can’t possibly be mistaken, we blame men.
When the feminists decided that “equality” wasn’t enough, they needed ways to control men; one of their tools was to demand that men stop acting powerful. Men, long in the habit of accommodating female foolishness, acquiesced. Most men didn’t see the long term harm in it, and “it’s barbaric,” or “it’s no longer necessary because we’re so civilized,” sounded rational. Because of this, displays of genuine masculine power are rare. Since women are desperate for powerful, high status men, we’ll take anything that remotely resembles male power, even when we know it’s probably fake. We’re drawn to it instinctively. This is why Game works consistently. Game is a display of power, whether that power is real or fake. It’s a useful tool that good men dropped when they were ordered to, figuring they could rely on their “goodness” to attract women. Assholes didn’t drop it, and for the most part, they’re the only ones still using it. And they’re getting the women.
Men have three choices: continue on as victims, go their own way until society implodes, or manipulate individual women, one on one, into embracing our natural role and rejecting our indoctrination. That last one is difficult and uncommon, but it’s possible, for a man who wants a family. Men, women and children, like dogs, can usually be trained. Ask any happily married man who uses Game to keep his wife in line, er, happy.

Sunday, March 4, 2012

I'm a Troll!

So...
Friday, Aaron (Captain Capitalism) linked to a Forbes article by Rick Ungar, and he encouraged his impressionable lieutenants to go on over and have a say-so.   Heh heh heh.  I did.  I'm such a patsy.

http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2012/03/attention-all-cappy-cap-lieutenants-you.html

and

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/03/02/wisconsin-gop-leader-proposes-legislation-to-blame-single-parents-for-child-abuse-and-neglect/2/

I have since discovered that Mr. Ungar isn't much of a journalist; he allows his emotions to blind him to objective facts.  Quel suprise. (I studied French for 9 years, I'm entitled.)

After Aaron and I pointed out to him the irrefutable fact that his stepchildren, while his wife was a single mother, were statistically more likely to suffer "abuse and neglect," and the likelihood of lifelong poverty and emotional misery which often follows, Ungar threw a classic Mangina/ White Knight hissy fit.  He peeled off his embroidered silk gauntlet, slapped our faces with it, and threw it too the ground (!)  Essentially he said,"*gasp* How dare  you insult my lovely wife by insinuating that she is anything less than a devoted, loving, strong, moral, caring (blahblahblah) mother!!!!!"  Of course, we did no such thing; we merely "implied" that his lovely wife is not exempt from statistical reality.  If she could manage to overcome the hardships of single-motherhood, as many women do, more power to her, but the risk still existed.

Then he decided to portray me, on a national forum, as the Troll from Hell.  He deleted two comments by me that showed me to be something other than a vicious heartless monster.  Incidentally, those comments also illustrated unequivocally that he had utterly misread my words and Arron's.  (But we won't assign him so devious a motive as, "Oops!  Can't let anybody know I was wrong!)  Ironically, he granted me permission to insult him, just not his wife.  Apparently "insults" are OK with him, but the unflattering truth about him is a big fat No-No.

All this in Forbes magazine, no less.  Ah, the vaunted standards of pure journalistic integrity!

                                                   Not!

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Yet Another Repost!

Dang, I sure do follow some interesting folks!
http://mcthag.blogspot.com/2012/03/key-words.html?zx=5dd082a8a8f4b0f

Here it is; it's very long, but a quick read:

DISCLAIMER

Viewing or use of this blog or any contents or links contained herein by any person or entity within the confines of the state of Tennessee is prohibited .

Violators of this policy agree to hold the owner of this blog, its contents and all links contained herein, harmless to any harm or offense taken or perceived.

01 MARCH 2012

Key Words

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is making a list, checking it twice.  Going to misdirect them with a list of all the things they're looking for thrice.


Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Coast Guard (USCG)
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Border Patrol
Secret Service (USSS)
National Operations Center (NOC)
Homeland Defense
Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Agent
Task Force
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Fusion Center
Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)
Secure Border Initiative (SBI)
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF)
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS)
Federal Air Marshal Service (FAMS)
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
Air Marshal
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
National Guard
Red Cross
United Nations (UN)
Domestic Security
Assassination
Attack
Domestic security
Drill
Exercise
Cops
Law enforcement
Authorities
Disaster assistance
Disaster management
DNDO (Domestic Nuclear Detection Office)
National preparedness
Mitigation
Prevention
Response
Recovery
Dirty Bomb
Domestic nuclear detection
Emergency management
Emergency response
First responder
Homeland security
Maritime domain awareness (MDA)
National preparedness initiative
Militia
Shooting
Shots fired
Evacuation
Deaths
Hostage
Explosion (explosive)
Police
Disaster medical assistance team (DMAT)
Organized crime
Gangs
National security
State of emergency
Security
Breach
Threat
Standoff
SWAT
Screening
Lockdown
Bomb (squad or threat)
Crash
Looting
Riot
Emergency Landing
Pipe bomb
Incident
Facility
HAZMAT & Nuclear
Hazmat
Nuclear
Chemical Spill
Suspicious package/device
Toxic
National laboratory
Nuclear facility
Nuclear threat
Cloud
Plume
Radiation
Radioactive
Leak
Biological infection (or event)
Chemical
Chemical burn
Biological
Epidemic
Hazardous
Hazardous material incident
Industrial spill
Infection
Powder (white)
Gas
Spillover
Anthrax
Blister agent
Exposure
Burn
Nerve agent
Ricin
Sarin
North Korea
Health Concern + H1N1
Outbreak
Contamination
Exposure
Virus
Evacuation
Bacteria
Recall
Ebola
Food Poisoning
Foot and Mouth (FMD)
H5N1
Avian
Flu
Salmonella
Small Pox
Plague
Human to human
Human to ANIMAL
Influenza
Center for Disease Control (CDC)
Drug Administration (FDA)
Public Health
Toxic
Agro Terror
Tuberculosis (TB)
Agriculture
Listeria
Symptoms
Mutation
Resistant
Antiviral
Wave
Pandemic
Infection
Water/air borne
Sick
Swine
Pork
Strain
Quarantine
H1N1
Vaccine
Tamiflu
Norvo Virus
Epidemic
World Health Organization (WHO and components)
Viral Hemorrhagic Fever
E. Coli
Infrastructure Security
Infrastructure security
Airport
CIKR (Critical Infrastructure & Key Resources)
AMTRAK
Collapse
Computer infrastructure
Communications infrastructure
Telecommunications
Critical infrastructure
National infrastructure
Metro
WMATA
Airplane (and derivatives)
Chemical fire
Subway
BART
MARTA
Port Authority
NBIC (National Biosurveillance Integration Center)
Transportation security
Grid
Power
Smart
Body scanner
Electric
Failure or outage
Black out
Brown out
Port
Dock
Bridge
Canceled
Delays
Service disruption
Power lines
Southwest Border Violence
Drug cartel
Violence
Gang
Drug
Narcotics
Cocaine
Marijuana
Heroin
Border
Mexico
Cartel
Southwest
Juarez
Sinaloa
Tijuana
Torreon
Yuma
Tucson
Decapitated
U.S. Consulate
Consular
El Paso
Fort Hancock
San Diego
Ciudad Juarez
Nogales
Sonora
Colombia
Mara salvatrucha
MS13 or MS-13
Drug war
Mexican army
Methamphetamine
Cartel de Golfo
Gulf Cartel
La Familia
Reynose
Nuevo Leon
Narcos
Narco banners (Spanish equivalents)
Los Zetas
Shootout
Execution
Gunfight
Trafficking
Kidnap
Calderon
Reyosa
Bust
Tamaulipas
Meth Lab
Drug trade
Illegal immigrants
Smuggling (smugglers)
Matamoros
Michoacana
Guzman
Arellano-Felix
Beltran-Leyva
Barrio Azteca
Artistics Assassins
Mexicles
New Federation
Terrorism
Terrorism
Al Queda (all spellings)
Terror
Attack
Iraq
Afghanistan
Iran
Pakistan
Agro
Environmental terrorist
Eco terrorism
Conventional weapon
Target
Weapons grade
Dirty bomb
Enriched
Nuclear
Chemical weapon
Biological weapon
Ammonium nitrate
Improvised explosive device
IED (Improvised Explosive Device)
Abu Sayyaf
Hamas
FARC (Armed Revolutionary Forces Colombia)
IRA (Irish Republican Army)
ETA (Euskadi ta Askatasuna)
Basque Separatists
Hezbollah
Tamil Tiger
PLF (Palestine Liberation Front)
PLO (Palestine Libration Organization)
Car bomb
Jihad
Taliban
Weapons cache
Suicide bomber
Suicide attack
Suspicious substance
AQAP (Al Qaeda Arabian Peninsula)
AQIM (Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb)
TTP (Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan)
Yemen
Pirates
Extremism
Somalia
Nigeria
Radicals
Al-Shabaab
Home grown
Plot
Nationalist
Recruitment
Fundamentalism
Islamist
Weather/Disaster/Emergency
Emergency
Hurricane
Tornado
Twister
Tsunami
Earthquake
Tremor
Flood
Storm
Crest
Temblor
Extreme weather
Forest fire
Brush fire
Ice
Stranded/Stuck
Help
Hail
Wildfire
Tsunami Warning Center
Magnitude
Avalanche
Typhoon
Shelter-in-place
Disaster
Snow
Blizzard
Sleet
Mud slide or Mudslide
Erosion
Power outage
Brown out
Warning
Watch
Lightening
Aid
Relief
Closure
Interstate
Burst
Emergency Broadcast System
Cyber Security
Botnet
DDOS (dedicated denial of service)
Denial of service
Malware
Virus
Trojan
Keylogger
Cyber Command
2600
Spammer
Phishing
Rootkit
Phreaking
Cain and abel
Brute forcing
Mysql injection
Cyber attack
Cyber terror
Hacker
China
Conficker
Worm
Scammers
Social media

1 comments:

  1. Bug-out bag
    Compound
    Arsenal

Friday, March 2, 2012

Comments

Blogger has gone all "Blogger" on me this past month!  Several comments were in my Spam box, yet I have never marked anybody as "Spam."  At least one person has been unable to comment at all.  I'm going to take another look at my settings, but I keep hearing similar stories from other bloggers, so it may not help.  Please do me a favor, and email me if this site gets contrary on you.  My apologies to you all.
blackhound44@gmail.com
driversuz44@gmail.com
(can you guess what my birthday is?)

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Reposting a Repost

Heh heh heh... from Sean:


A proud member of the Forces of Darkness 

THURSDAY, MARCH 1, 2012

Chris proves that his cat is smarter than Joan Peterson

It seems that even Chris from Arma Borealis’s cat is smart enough to recognize that inanimate objects pose no threat. 


One wonders how sad it must be to lose an intelligence contest with a housecat.


===================================================

Bent Objects

I love Bent Objects.  I cut/pasted the whole thing:  Here's the link:

http://bentobjects.blogspot.com/2012/03/nutty-politicians.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BentObjects+%28Bent+Objects%29



THURSDAY, MARCH 01, 2012

Nutty Politicians






With the Republican primary season still very interesting,
 I thought we would take a look at what's happening 
out on the campaign trail.










Mr. and Mrs. Newt visit a school.













Rick meets some of his followers.











Mitt arrives at a rally.











Ron is wandering around somewhere.












Which one will the elephant choose?









No one can say that it hasn't been entertaining. 






























Until next time.