It almost brings me to tears that such words can still be spoken in public, in front of our nation's leaders. I'm sure the MSM won't be publicizing it in its entirety, as the MSM is, and is owned by, that "fourth" branch of government. So share it. Please. Everywhere and with everyone.
Monday, February 11, 2013
'Nuff Said
It almost brings me to tears that such words can still be spoken in public, in front of our nation's leaders. I'm sure the MSM won't be publicizing it in its entirety, as the MSM is, and is owned by, that "fourth" branch of government. So share it. Please. Everywhere and with everyone.
If Anybody Wonders Why I'm Trying to Build Bridges...
... between my 2nd Amendment friends and my MHRA friends, it's because they have so very much in common - a love of Freedom, as extolled in the Declaration of Independence and as described in the US Constitution.
*link:
http://adaptivecurmudgeon.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/internal-inconsistencies-of-life-which-i-will-not-abide-part-i/
" Internal Inconsistencies Of Life Which I will Not Abide: Part I
Go read the rest of it!
(IMH - and unscientific - O, the main sticking points seem to be thus: Many 2A activists still buy into the myth of traditional chivalry, and some MHRAs still buy into the myth that restricting guns will reduce violence.)
*link:
http://adaptivecurmudgeon.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/internal-inconsistencies-of-life-which-i-will-not-abide-part-i/
" Internal Inconsistencies Of Life Which I will Not Abide: Part I
“There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.” Douglas Adams, Hitchhiker’s Guide to The Galaxy
I’ve been told to believe too much inconsistent nonsense and it’s bad juju. Therefore I’ve sifted through a small sample of bullshit which has been shoveled my way and started a list (in no particular order) of “concepts which piss me off” (TM). "
(IMH - and unscientific - O, the main sticking points seem to be thus: Many 2A activists still buy into the myth of traditional chivalry, and some MHRAs still buy into the myth that restricting guns will reduce violence.)
Thursday, February 7, 2013
JudgyBitch for the Win!
...and Amanda Marcotte staggering around unable to breathe, due to her neck being firmly in the grip of he anal sphincter:
Go read this
Golden wisdom:
"Yay, ladies! Don’t be support staff for the man you love! Go and do it for someone else....
Women found being a housewife so terribly dull and dreary and oppressive that they flocked to the labor market to teach children their alphabet, tend to the sick, fold clothes, care for the elderly, cook food, fetch food, clean house and take care of small children. And that’s just all the ladies who couldn’t find a cushy job organizing a man’s professional life.
Go read this
Golden wisdom:
"Yay, ladies! Don’t be support staff for the man you love! Go and do it for someone else....
Women found being a housewife so terribly dull and dreary and oppressive that they flocked to the labor market to teach children their alphabet, tend to the sick, fold clothes, care for the elderly, cook food, fetch food, clean house and take care of small children. And that’s just all the ladies who couldn’t find a cushy job organizing a man’s professional life.
Organizing, tending, fetching, wiping noses and asses, cooking and cleaning.
Wow. Those are some pretty big ambitions."
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
I Have SO F*ing Made the Big Time!!!
Oh, I'm so excited my toes are tingling! Man boobs, none other than David Futrelle (!!!!!!!!!) has posted one of my articles from A Voice for Men, and lambasted it in his inimitable style! His piece is a classic, chock full of (what he thinks are) devious strategies to discredit me, and to say, "You're such a meanie-poopie!" His sparkling gems include:
"... used a picture of a brutalized woman to illustrate a post about domestic violence."
Well damn, how stupid of me. I should have used a picture of a frolicking puppy! That would draw man boobs readers in droves!
"... her basic argument – that feminism perpetuates domestic violence for profit – is even more insidiously victim-blaming."
Uh-huh. Okaaaaaay. I specifically blame feminist policies for perpetuating DV, and that means I blame DV victims. I'm afraid I'll need some LSD to make that connection. Can someone help me out here? Anyone? Bueller?
"Every single one of these people would happily give up their job if domestic violence went away.
Um, Yah. I'm not kidding; David Futrelle, who presumably lives on this planet, said that.
"... domestic violence has fallen considerably since the early 1990s."
1. That statement contradicts what, some claim I didn't make, that maybe DV has increased?
2. I wonder how much DV would have decreased since the early 1990s if millions of children had been removed from their violent mothers. Just a thought.
"...“about 4 in 5 victims of intimate partner violence were female.” Numerous other studies using different methodologies also find that women make up the majority of victims. The only studies that find similar rates of abuse – which are also, not coincidentally, the only ones that MRAs like to cite – are based on problematic methodologies that end up essentially equating mild and severe violence, pretending that a slap on the face is basically the same as a severe beating when it comes to determining which gender is responsible for the most abuse."
David doesn't "cite" the "problematic" nature of those methodologies, but anybody want to take bets that those are the studies not funded by feminists?
(oddly related:)
"Suz, naturally, presents no evidence for any of this"
'Nuff said.
"Violent fathers are not exactly a “stabilizing” influence on the home."
And we all know that fathers are men! And men are prone to violence! So naturally when I say "fathers," I mean violent men, right? (I actually followed that line of reasoning without the use of illicit drugs. That's kind of scary.) David won't be discussing violent mothers of course, because they're the victims - 742% of the time.
"And feminism is responsible for this how?"
And I said feminism is responsible for all of the variables causing DV where? (Sorry, I know that one wasn't really worthy of mention, but I'm guessing by the end of the night, one of hissycophants commenters is going to make a huuuuge-assed deal out of it)
"Citation fucking needed."
The battle cry of every troll.
***
Part 2: The Booblets
(I know. This is the part you were waiting for.)
Thus far there are only a few, but hoo-boy! Go check 'em out but try not to trip on the hamsters:
Freemage:
"Toss in a few more variables like substance abuse, a string of violent boyfriends, and a bit of poverty, and this process is guaranteed to produce future domestic abusers.
"... used a picture of a brutalized woman to illustrate a post about domestic violence."
Well damn, how stupid of me. I should have used a picture of a frolicking puppy! That would draw man boobs readers in droves!
"... her basic argument – that feminism perpetuates domestic violence for profit – is even more insidiously victim-blaming."
Uh-huh. Okaaaaaay. I specifically blame feminist policies for perpetuating DV, and that means I blame DV victims. I'm afraid I'll need some LSD to make that connection. Can someone help me out here? Anyone? Bueller?
"Every single one of these people would happily give up their job if domestic violence went away.
Um, Yah. I'm not kidding; David Futrelle, who presumably lives on this planet, said that.
"... domestic violence has fallen considerably since the early 1990s."
1. That statement contradicts what, some claim I didn't make, that maybe DV has increased?
2. I wonder how much DV would have decreased since the early 1990s if millions of children had been removed from their violent mothers. Just a thought.
"...“about 4 in 5 victims of intimate partner violence were female.” Numerous other studies using different methodologies also find that women make up the majority of victims. The only studies that find similar rates of abuse – which are also, not coincidentally, the only ones that MRAs like to cite – are based on problematic methodologies that end up essentially equating mild and severe violence, pretending that a slap on the face is basically the same as a severe beating when it comes to determining which gender is responsible for the most abuse."
David doesn't "cite" the "problematic" nature of those methodologies, but anybody want to take bets that those are the studies not funded by feminists?
(oddly related:)
"Suz, naturally, presents no evidence for any of this"
'Nuff said.
"Violent fathers are not exactly a “stabilizing” influence on the home."
And we all know that fathers are men! And men are prone to violence! So naturally when I say "fathers," I mean violent men, right? (I actually followed that line of reasoning without the use of illicit drugs. That's kind of scary.) David won't be discussing violent mothers of course, because they're the victims - 742% of the time.
"And feminism is responsible for this how?"
And I said feminism is responsible for all of the variables causing DV where? (Sorry, I know that one wasn't really worthy of mention, but I'm guessing by the end of the night, one of his
"Citation fucking needed."
The battle cry of every troll.
***
Part 2: The Booblets
(I know. This is the part you were waiting for.)
Thus far there are only a few, but hoo-boy! Go check 'em out but try not to trip on the hamsters:
Freemage:
"Toss in a few more variables like substance abuse, a string of violent boyfriends, and a bit of poverty, and this process is guaranteed to produce future domestic abusers.
Okay, since you did a marvelous job of taking down most of this drek, I’m gonna point out one little piece that escaped your notice. Apparently, this moron doesn’t think that DV opponents want to also protect women from violent boyfriends as well as violent husbands/fathers. This alone shows that she’s blaring out her rectum."
Erm, when violent broads' violent husbands are sent packing, who's left to tolerate their violence? That's right, violent boyfriends. Now if feminists acknowledged that women *gasp* are capable of violence, perhaps feminists might teach women how to be less violent....
LBT:
"-_-
"-_-
Just… -_-
There is too much wrong for me to talk to. All I can do is post up unhappy emotes."
What??? No kitten pictures???
Carleyblue:
"Yeah…
"Yeah…
Have you noticed they’re all using their real names now? (at least some of them). I was looking at AvfM a few days ago, and honestly, they do seem to be making progress. This worries me. I think I might need to stay away from here for a while."
and
"They are obviously trying to separate themselves from the more extreme MRAs and the ‘manosphere’, decrying things like homophobia, transphobia, etc. That makes them even more potentially dangerous, in my opinion."
Mwahahahahaha! *twirls mustache*
Kim:
Mwahahahahaha! *twirls mustache*
Kim:
Yes, women are responsible for most DV.
Well, if you’re an MRA and you think that abused women demand to be abused, then of course you think women are more responsible. They’re *asking* for it! *gag*
Classic intentional misreading. Doesn't everyone know that "women are responsible for most DV," obviously means, "women get down on their knees and beg to be beaten?" Cuz gosh it couldn't possibly mean, "Women commit most DV."
Thanks, Boobzie! You're awesome!
edited to add this irresistible morsel:
Hellkell:
"Gender neutral except for the name" Holy fuck.
edited to add this irresistible morsel:
Hellkell:
Suz is Queen Asshole of Fuckface Mountain. If she’d bothered to do the lightest of googlings, she’d know that VAVA is gender neutral except for the name. But we all know that would get in the way of her ASSFAX and then maybe she wouldn’t be the mostest special snowflake over there.
I wonder if she’ll try to sock her way into this discussion.
Word
Posted on the A Voice for Men Facebook page:
Among the comments:
"How many feminists have glanced downward in horror while walking across this bridge , no doubt they will campaign to remove the offending shadows..."
and
" it is not the shadows that offend them, it is the light. Same as always."
https://www.facebook.com/pages/A-Voice-for-Men/102001393188684?ref=stream
Among the comments:
"How many feminists have glanced downward in horror while walking across this bridge , no doubt they will campaign to remove the offending shadows..."
and
" it is not the shadows that offend them, it is the light. Same as always."
https://www.facebook.com/pages/A-Voice-for-Men/102001393188684?ref=stream
Friday, February 1, 2013
Mocking Jezebel part 3
"Turns Out Texts About Abducted Children are Super Annoying"
You're a feminist. To you everything is "super annoying."
Fuck you Jezebel.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)