Notable Quotable:

Notable Quotable:

Remember, folks: whenever a woman says "die for me because you are a man," just look her in the eye and say "my body, my choice."
TCM

Monday, October 22, 2012

deti Says:

"And women wonder why men don’t trust them."

Sunshine Mary at The Woman and the Dragon, found a  real winner on a site devoted to cheating.  This one is a Rationalization Hamster on steroids; her virtue is palpable!

"My husband is a sensitive caring man with soft features. The men who fathered my children are much better looking, more masculine, and healthier than my hubby. If you were to ever meet my husband, you would agree that he is not the ideal man to mate with, but he would be a good dad."


I cheated on my husband to secure better genes for my children


Is this "Karen" broad and outlier, an extreme?  Maybe, but I have two much more important questions:

1. Where did "Karen" ever get the idea that she is entitled to the "ideal" of one man's money and another man's sperm?

2. If her husband ever learns the truth, what are the chances he can walk away from this depraved skank and her bastard children, with his assets intact?

16 comments:

  1. Well, this isn't hamster. It's refreshing absence of hamster.

    At least hypocrites understand, on some level, that the way they are behaving is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh I disagree; it is Hamster. She's intelligent enough to cognitively understand the roots of her behavior but she doesn't believe that she's wrong for engaging in it; she believes that her biologically determined hypergamy JUSTIFIES her betrayal of her husband. (Perhaps because only MEN are required to restrain their instinctive impulses - by reasoning through them. How safe would she be if her husband found out she was cheating, and let HIS instincts guide HIS behavior?) She may not be hysterical and illogical, but she is definitely rationalizing her destructive behavior.

      She uses some good excuses to make the argument that her behavior is the correct behavior. Did you notice however, that she couldn't answer the question: "So are you OK with the fact that your children might not be well suited to being good long-term partners?"
      If she's so well informed about evo-psych, why does she dismiss the issue of inherited personality traits?

      Because she didn't do her homework. She found a scientific theory that matches up with what she wants to do, and she grabbed it without taking the time to understand its ramifications. If it "looks good on paper," that's all she needs.

      Turbo Hamster, and frighteningly articulate.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for the linkage!

    There is no way this man could divorce her and not end up paying child support. It's sick.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "...
    1. Where did "Karen" ever get the idea that she is entitled to the "ideal" of one man's money and another man's sperm?"

    Answer: from feminism, of course!
    Since the day she was born, she has been told what a 'special snowflake' she is, what a wonderful 'princess' she will be because she was born with a vagina, and how she is ENTITLED to whatever she wants -- no matter what!
    She has been taught that 'winning' is EVERYTHING, and that 'morals', 'virtue', 'honor', 'honesty', and 'respect towards others' are for LOSERS...or stupid, 'icky' men (same thing).
    She has also been taught to use her sexuality as a weapon and a way to power (no matter how unethical and how much it harms others -- even her own children), how to use others (especially men and their hateful 'patriarchy') and especially how to use men's sense of 'justice', 'honor', and 'chivalry' against them and others, all for her own amusement and benefit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could not have said it better myself!

      Delete
  4. Just suppose. She has sons. Her sons marry "their mother".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Next question: Would that be poetic justice, or wouldit just be two more men paying the price for one woman's narcissism?

      Delete
  5. This is what happens when the the family courts will base their decisions on what is in the best interest of the children. Pretty soon, you might see an agency for beta providers, where men are assigned out to women to take care of them instead of the welfare agencies. All of these women will of course be be impregnated by pseudo-alpha thugs now residing in prison. The laws do need to change. Child support needs to go away. It is the primary means of enslaving men. Means based support is a travesty. You should pay for the children's expenses based on the amount of time you spend with them. You have the kids 1/2 the time, then you pay 1/2 the costs. You have the children 80% of the time, then you pay 80% of the expenses. A man or woman wants to walk away, then they owe the other parent nothing. Yes this system allows people to be immoral. I would likely shame a man who turned his back on his kids because they cost too much, but he should be allowed to.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Pretty soon, you might see an agency for beta providers, where men are assigned out to women to take care of them instead of the welfare agencies. All of these women will of course be be impregnated by pseudo-alpha thugs now residing in prison."

    Since these prisons will be run by women, they will be oases (oasises? oasii?) of comfy, spacious cells, heated pools, full cable package, and twice weekly duty serving women in the Boom Rooms. Sounds like a reverse Hefner Mansion, kind of nice, really.

    'Scuse me while I go punch a cop.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm not sure I believe this is for real, but I suppose you can't put anything past people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep. Could be a troll, but on a site like that, anything goes.

      Delete
  8. This made me want to vomit... On her face.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's pretty sad when people can have such reckless abandon with other people's lives. I remember back in bootcamp (navy) how our RDCs gave us forewarning regarding the kind of women that seek us out for the cash and prizes. I've also seen many of craiglist ads that flat out ask for strictly a contract marriage. I don't know what it is with today's women, but expecting them self-sufficient almost seems like an insult to them.

    "Hey honey how was your day?"
    "Oh it was alright, come here, gimme kiss (and enjoy my c*ck breath)."

    Yup, I'm sure she just LOOOOOOOOVES him.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 1. Where did "Karen" ever get the idea that she is entitled to the "ideal" of one man's money and another man's sperm?

    2. If her husband ever learns the truth, what are the chances he can walk away from this depraved skank and her bastard children, with his assets intact?

    Answers

    1. Feminism and hook up culture that derived from it; and the male version in reaction to it.

    2. He does not stand a chance. You Go Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrlllllllllll. Just let him know that "she" is the epitomy of feminist equality.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I have a nurse sister who worked in maternity for years. She said that ~10% of the babies she saw were not related to the father based on blood type alone. She figured that the actual percentage of cuckolds was around 18%. One in six chances that the baby and the 'daddy' weren't related. Roll a die and if it comes up one...

    ReplyDelete