tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3697201505856242009.post1919366236965969212..comments2023-09-18T04:52:34.622-07:00Comments on Shining Pearls of Something: Awesome New Men's Blog from Seattlesuzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07599102235797825599noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3697201505856242009.post-87721069536234468392012-09-23T07:41:50.514-07:002012-09-23T07:41:50.514-07:00It happens; there are good medical reasons for cir...It happens; there are good medical reasons for circumcision, which is why it should be a choice - made by the guy who owns the penis, and nobody else.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06896718673192738974noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3697201505856242009.post-40190645241190984402012-09-23T07:26:58.384-07:002012-09-23T07:26:58.384-07:00It's an anecdote, but a friend of mine had to ...It's an anecdote, but a friend of mine had to had a circumcision because his foreskin was not elastic enough and was cutting off blood flow to the glans during erections. A painful condition at minimum, and had the potential for him losing his penis.<br /><br />I have heard of no corresponding benefits to female circumcision.<br /><br />I am wondering now, if I should belly up to the victimhood trough and create a male genital mutilation survivor's society.Angus McThaghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09295013525738248801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3697201505856242009.post-73923216279930651012012-09-15T20:42:16.203-07:002012-09-15T20:42:16.203-07:00I have only looked briefly at the research, but th...I have only looked briefly at the research, but there's far more to it. The benefits are negligible, and there certainly are risks. <br /><br />Additionally, there was quite the fracas over some essentially "symbolic" female circumcisions being done in the US. (The girls' genitals were literally nicked enough to draw less than a drop of blood.) Due to the "Principle," one would have thought these girls were being skinned alive and fed piece by piece to alligators. <br /><br />The only distortions are the claims it's perfectly normal to cut up a baby boy's genitals, and utterly obscene to cut up a baby girl's.<br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06896718673192738974noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3697201505856242009.post-61926030452770738982012-09-15T20:24:10.146-07:002012-09-15T20:24:10.146-07:00good information but there's at least one erro...good information but there's at least one error/distortion? Circumcision (male genital mutilation according to the post) has significant health benefits and no documented negatives, while female genital mutilation is the exact opposite.heresolonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00461382067580153600noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3697201505856242009.post-71671406670649537522012-08-31T09:01:51.186-07:002012-08-31T09:01:51.186-07:00Thanks for the crosspost!Thanks for the crosspost!SeattleMRAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03710282772492984711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3697201505856242009.post-23454295480834147912012-08-31T07:36:44.340-07:002012-08-31T07:36:44.340-07:00Good information.Good information.Well Seasoned Foolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16670165728759453075noreply@blogger.com